The BBC Royal Charter Review your last chance to complete the public consultation

The government is consulting the public to aid decision-making on the terms for the BBC Charter’s renewal and any changes needed to help the BBC to continue to serve the public. If you value demoacracy with pluralistic news services plus a pluralist media landscape, it is crucial that you respond to the consultation.

If you value the BBC as a vital part of democracy then please ensure you complete the survey and make sure your views are known. 
This consultation closes at 11:59pm on 10 March 2026

I have complete the survey as an email response and my full response can be found here:

Submission to the open consultation on the BBC Royal Charter Review from Chris Hodgkins

Please feel free to use any part of my submission and cut and paste at will or with reckless abandon.

There is an online survey or you can email your responses:

How to email your responses

1 They would prefer you to answer the survey questions as it helps them structure and analyse your thoughts and views, although it is not mandatory. If you want to respond by email please copy and paste the questions into a new email or a word document and send Send your email to: bbccharterreview@dcms.gov.uk

2 If you’re answering the survey questions, write your responses below each question. The survey can be found here: https://dcms.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9EOcvcDvkNu8c9E

Please note

If you complete the question or you cut an paste my answers in – and please feel free to use what ever you like and cut and paste away. Question 24 needs to be answered. The form allows 350 words and my suggested answer is 348. If you are a musician I suggest you use this if you are a promoter you will have to finesse as best you can:

“From the perspective of a working jazz musician, the current regulation process feels poorly aligned with the realities of artists, small organisations and grassroots creative ecosystems. Although the system is built around large‑scale market assessments, musicians experience the BBC’s influence in far more immediate ways: who receives commissions? Which genres are supported? And whether regional scenes are visible beyond their local circuits? The process often appears slow, opaque and overly focused on protecting commercial incumbents rather than supporting the cultural diversity and innovation sustains creative careers.

For jazz, these shortcomings are particularly pronounced. Jazz depends on discovery, specialist broadcasting and the visibility of live scenes. When the BBC reduces specialist programming or shifts resources away from niche genres, the effects are immediate: emerging artists lose exposure, independent venues lose visibility, and the pipeline of new talent becomes more fragile. Yet these impacts rarely register in formal market assessments, which tend to prioritise the interests of large commercial broadcasters rather than the independent, community‑based and often precarious parts of the sector where jazz thrives.

A more effective system would begin with a deeper understanding of how the BBC interacts with the creative economy at the level of genres, local scenes and independent production. Greater transparency how decisions are made, how evidence is weighed and how stakeholders can engage would help musicians and small organisations navigate the process. The system should recognise the positive market impact the BBC can have: commissioning new work, supporting specialist presenters, investing in regional music communities and giving airtime to artists who struggle to be heard. These contributions are not distortions of the market; they are essential to the health of the UK’s cultural ecology.

A more responsive and artist‑centred approach – that listens to musicians, values specialist genres and understands the role of public service broadcasting in nurturing creative diversity — would transform the regulatory process from a barrier into a partnership. The important improvement is a system that recognises the BBC’s unique role in sustaining culturally significant genres that commercial markets routinely overlook, and that treats this cultural value as central to its assessment”.